一番優秀なACD301専門知識訓練と}信頼できるACD301模擬モード

AppianのACD301は専門知識と情報技術の検査として認証試験で、Xhs1991はあなたに一日早くAppianの認証試験に合格させて、多くの人が大量の時間とエネルギーを費やしても無駄になりました。Xhs1991にその問題が心配でなく、わずか20時間と少ないお金をを使って楽に試験に合格することができます。Xhs1991は君に対して特別の訓練を提供しています。

Appian ACD301 認定試験の出題範囲：

>> ACD301専門知識訓練 <<

更新するACD301専門知識訓練と一番優秀なACD301模擬モード

当社Xhs1991は常に業界標準を順守しています。最新のACD301実際のダンプの定期的な試験問題に精通している専門家の助けを借りて。彼らはあなたの知識に飢えた心を満たすことができます。また、ACD301試験クイズは品質保証されています。ここ数年、お客様に高品質のACD301実践教材を提供することに専念することで、すべてのコンテンツが実践と記憶に不可欠な部分であることを保証できます。

Appian Lead Developer 認定 ACD301 試験問題 (Q21-Q26):

質問 # 21
You are required to configure a connection so that Jira can inform Appian when specific tickets change (using a webhook). Which three required steps will allow you to connect both systems?

• A. Give the service account system administrator privileges.
• B. Create a Web API object and set up the correct security.
• C. Configure the connection in Jira specifying the URL and credentials.
• D. Create a new API Key and associate a service account.
• E. Create an integration object from Appian to Jira to periodically check the ticket status.

正解：B、C、D

解説：
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:
Configuring a webhook connection from Jira to Appian requires setting up a mechanism for Jira to push ticket change notifications to Appian in real-time. This involves creating an endpoint in Appian to receive the webhook and configuring Jira to send the data. Appian's Integration Best Practices and Web API documentation provide the framework for this process.
Option A (Create a Web API object and set up the correct security):
This is a required step. In Appian, a Web API object serves as the endpoint to receive incoming webhook requests from Jira. You must define the API structure (e.g., HTTP method, input parameters) and configure security (e.g., basic authentication, API key, or OAuth) to validate incoming requests. Appian recommends using a service account with appropriate permissions to ensure secure access, aligning with the need for a controlled webhook receiver.
Option B (Configure the connection in Jira specifying the URL and credentials):
This is essential. In Jira, you need to set up a webhook by providing the Appian Web API's URL (e.g., https://<appian-site>/suite/webapi/<web-api-name>) and the credentials or authentication method (e.g., API key or basic auth) that match the security setup in Appian. This ensures Jira can successfully send ticket change events to Appian.
Option C (Create a new API Key and associate a service account):
This is necessary for secure authentication. Appian recommends using an API key tied to a service account for webhook integrations. The service account should have permissions to process the incoming data (e.g., write to a process or data store) but not excessive privileges. This step complements the Web API security setup and Jira configuration.
Option D (Give the service account system administrator privileges):
This is unnecessary and insecure. System administrator privileges grant broad access, which is overkill for a webhook integration. Appian's security best practices advocate for least-privilege principles, limiting the service account to the specific objects or actions needed (e.g., executing the Web API).
Option E (Create an integration object from Appian to Jira to periodically check the ticket status):
This is incorrect for a webhook scenario. Webhooks are push-based, where Jira notifies Appian of changes. Creating an integration object for periodic polling (pull-based) is a different approach and not required for the stated requirement of Jira informing Appian via webhook.
These three steps (A, B, C) establish a secure, functional webhook connection without introducing unnecessary complexity or security risks.
Reference:
The three required steps that will allow you to connect both systems are:
A . Create a Web API object and set up the correct security. This will allow you to define an endpoint in Appian that can receive requests from Jira via webhook. You will also need to configure the security settings for the Web API object, such as authentication method, allowed origins, and access control.
B . Configure the connection in Jira specifying the URL and credentials. This will allow you to set up a webhook in Jira that can send requests to Appian when specific tickets change. You will need to specify the URL of the Web API object in Appian, as well as any credentials required for authentication.
C . Create a new API Key and associate a service account. This will allow you to generate a unique token that can be used for authentication between Jira and Appian. You will also need to create a service account in Appian that has permissions to access or update data related to Jira tickets.
The other options are incorrect for the following reasons:
D . Give the service account system administrator privileges. This is not required and could pose a security risk, as giving system administrator privileges to a service account could allow it to perform actions that are not related to Jira tickets, such as modifying system settings or accessing sensitive data.
E . Create an integration object from Appian to Jira to periodically check the ticket status. This is not required and could cause unnecessary overhead, as creating an integration object from Appian to Jira would involve polling Jira for ticket status changes, which could consume more resources than using webhook notifications. Verified Reference: Appian Documentation, section "Web API" and "API Keys".

質問 # 22
You are running an inspection as part of the first deployment process from TEST to PROD. You receive a notice that one of your objects will not deploy because it is dependent on an object from an application owned by a separate team.
What should be your next step?

• A. Create your own object with the same code base, replace the dependent object in the application, and deploy to PROD.
• B. Push a functionally viable package to PROD without the dependencies, and plan the rest of the deployment accordingly with the other team's constraints.
• C. Check the dependencies of the necessary object. Deploy to PROD if there are few dependencies and it is low risk.
• D. Halt the production deployment and contact the other team for guidance on promoting the object to PROD.

正解：D

解説：
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:
As an Appian Lead Developer, managing a deployment from TEST to PROD requires careful handling of dependencies, especially when objects from another team's application are involved. The scenario describes a dependency issue during deployment, signaling a need for collaboration and governance. Let's evaluate each option:
A . Create your own object with the same code base, replace the dependent object in the application, and deploy to PROD:
This approach involves duplicating the object, which introduces redundancy, maintenance risks, and potential version control issues. It violates Appian's governance principles, as objects should be owned and managed by their respective teams to ensure consistency and avoid conflicts. Appian's deployment best practices discourage duplicating objects unless absolutely necessary, making this an unsustainable and risky solution.
B . Halt the production deployment and contact the other team for guidance on promoting the object to PROD:
This is the correct step. When an object from another application (owned by a separate team) is a dependency, Appian's deployment process requires coordination to ensure both applications' objects are deployed in sync. Halting the deployment prevents partial deployments that could break functionality, and contacting the other team aligns with Appian's collaboration and governance guidelines. The other team can provide the necessary object version, adjust their deployment timeline, or resolve the dependency, ensuring a stable PROD environment.
C . Check the dependencies of the necessary object. Deploy to PROD if there are few dependencies and it is low risk:
This approach risks deploying an incomplete or unstable application if the dependency isn't fully resolved. Even with "few dependencies" and "low risk," deploying without the other team's object could lead to runtime errors or broken functionality in PROD. Appian's documentation emphasizes thorough dependency management during deployment, requiring all objects (including those from other applications) to be promoted together, making this risky and not recommended.
D . Push a functionally viable package to PROD without the dependencies, and plan the rest of the deployment accordingly with the other team's constraints:
Deploying without dependencies creates an incomplete solution, potentially leaving the application non-functional or unstable in PROD. Appian's deployment process ensures all dependencies are included to maintain application integrity, and partial deployments are discouraged unless explicitly planned (e.g., phased rollouts). This option delays resolution and increases risk, contradicting Appian's best practices for Production stability.
Conclusion: Halting the production deployment and contacting the other team for guidance (B) is the next step. It ensures proper collaboration, aligns with Appian's governance model, and prevents deployment errors, providing a safe and effective resolution.
Reference:
Appian Documentation: "Deployment Best Practices" (Managing Dependencies Across Applications).
Appian Lead Developer Certification: Application Management Module (Cross-Team Collaboration).
Appian Best Practices: "Handling Production Deployments" (Dependency Resolution).

質問 # 23
The business database for a large, complex Appian application is to undergo a migration between database technologies, as well as interface and process changes. The project manager asks you to recommend a test strategy. Given the changes, which two items should be included in the test strategy?

• A. Tests that ensure users can still successfully log into the platform
• B. A regression test of all existing system functionality
• C. Tests for each of the interfaces and process changes
• D. Internationalization testing of the Appian platform
• E. Penetration testing of the Appian platform

正解：B、C

解説：
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:
As an Appian Lead Developer, recommending a test strategy for a large, complex application undergoing a database migration (e.g., from Oracle to PostgreSQL) and interface/process changes requires focusing on ensuring system stability, functionality, and the specific updates. The strategy must address risks tied to the scope-database technology shift, interface modifications, and process updates-while aligning with Appian's testing best practices. Let's evaluate each option:
A . Internationalization testing of the Appian platform:
Internationalization testing verifies that the application supports multiple languages, locales, and formats (e.g., date formats). While valuable for global applications, the scenario doesn't indicate a change in localization requirements tied to the database migration, interfaces, or processes. Appian's platform handles internationalization natively (e.g., via locale settings), and this isn't impacted by database technology or UI/process changes unless explicitly stated. This is out of scope for the given context and not a priority.
B . A regression test of all existing system functionality:
This is a critical inclusion. A database migration between technologies can affect data integrity, queries (e.g., a!queryEntity), and performance due to differences in SQL dialects, indexing, or drivers. Regression testing ensures that all existing functionality-records, reports, processes, and integrations-works as expected post-migration. Appian Lead Developer documentation mandates regression testing for significant infrastructure changes like this, as unmapped edge cases (e.g., datatype mismatches) could break the application. Given the "large, complex" nature, full-system validation is essential to catch unintended impacts.
C . Penetration testing of the Appian platform:
Penetration testing assesses security vulnerabilities (e.g., injection attacks). While security is important, the changes described-database migration, interface, and process updates-don't inherently alter Appian's security model (e.g., authentication, encryption), which is managed at the platform level. Appian's cloud or on-premise security isn't directly tied to database technology unless new vulnerabilities are introduced (not indicated here). This is a periodic concern, not specific to this migration, making it less relevant than functional validation.
D . Tests for each of the interfaces and process changes:
This is also essential. The project includes explicit "interface and process changes" alongside the migration. Interface updates (e.g., SAIL forms) might rely on new data structures or queries, while process changes (e.g., modified process models) could involve updated nodes or logic. Testing each change ensures these components function correctly with the new database and meet business requirements. Appian's testing guidelines emphasize targeted validation of modified components to confirm they integrate with the migrated data layer, making this a primary focus of the strategy.
E . Tests that ensure users can still successfully log into the platform:
Login testing verifies authentication (e.g., SSO, LDAP), typically managed by Appian's security layer, not the business database. A database migration affects application data, not user authentication, unless the database stores user credentials (uncommon in Appian, which uses separate identity management). While a quick sanity check, it's narrow and subsumed by broader regression testing (B), making it redundant as a standalone item.
Conclusion: The two key items are B (regression test of all existing system functionality) and D (tests for each of the interfaces and process changes). Regression testing (B) ensures the database migration doesn't disrupt the entire application, while targeted testing (D) validates the specific interface and process updates. Together, they cover the full scope-existing stability and new functionality-aligning with Appian's recommended approach for complex migrations and modifications.
Reference:
Appian Documentation: "Testing Best Practices" (Regression and Component Testing).
Appian Lead Developer Certification: Application Maintenance Module (Database Migration Strategies).
Appian Best Practices: "Managing Large-Scale Changes in Appian" (Test Planning).

質問 # 24
You are in a backlog refinement meeting with the development team and the product owner. You review a story for an integration involving a third-party system. A payload will be sent from the Appian system through the integration to the third-party system. The story is 21 points on a Fibonacci scale and requires development from your Appian team as well as technical resources from the third-party system. This item is crucial to your project's success. What are the two recommended steps to ensure this story can be developed effectively?

• A. Break down the item into smaller stories.
• B. Identify subject matter experts (SMEs) to perform user acceptance testing (UAT).
• C. Maintain a communication schedule with the third-party resources.
• D. Acquire testing steps from QA resources.

正解：A、C

解説：
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:This question involves a complex integration story rated at 21 points on the Fibonacci scale, indicating significant complexity and effort. Appian Lead Developer best practices emphasize effective collaboration, risk mitigation, and manageable development scopes for such scenarios. The two most critical steps are:
* Option C (Maintain a communication schedule with the third-party resources):Integrations with third-party systems require close coordination, as Appian developers depend on external teams for endpoint specifications, payload formats, authentication details, and testing support. Establishing a regular communication schedule ensures alignment on requirements, timelines, and issue resolution.
Appian's Integration Best Practices documentation highlights the importance of proactive communication with external stakeholders to prevent delays and misunderstandings, especially for critical project components.
* Option D (Break down the item into smaller stories):A 21-point story is considered large by Agile standards (Fibonacci scale typically flags anything above 13 as complex). Appian's Agile Development Guide recommends decomposing large stories into smaller, independently deliverable pieces to reduce risk, improve testability, and enable iterative progress. For example, the integration could be split into tasks like designing the payload structure, building the integration object, and testing the connection- each manageable within a sprint. This approach aligns with the principle of delivering value incrementally while maintaining quality.
* Option A (Acquire testing steps from QA resources):While QA involvement is valuable, this step is more relevant during the testing phase rather than backlog refinement or development preparation. It's not a primary step for ensuring effective development of the story.
* Option B (Identify SMEs for UAT):User acceptance testing occurs after development, during the validation phase. Identifying SMEs is important but not a key step in ensuring the story is developed effectively during the refinement and coding stages.
By choosingCandD, you address both the external dependency (third-party coordination) and internal complexity (story size), ensuring a smoother development process for this critical integration.
References:Appian Lead Developer Training - Integration Best Practices, Appian Agile Development Guide
- Story Refinement and Decomposition.

質問 # 25
You are tasked to build a large-scale acquisition application for a prominent customer. The acquisition process tracks the time it takes to fulfill a purchase request with an award.
The customer has structured the contract so that there are multiple application development teams.
How should you design for multiple processes and forms, while minimizing repeated code?

• A. Create a Scrum of Scrums sprint meeting for the team leads.
• B. Create duplicate processes and forms as needed.
• C. Create a Center of Excellence (CoE).
• D. Create a common objects application.

正解：D

解説：
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:
As an Appian Lead Developer, designing a large-scale acquisition application with multiple development teams requires a strategy to manage processes, forms, and code reuse effectively. The goal is to minimize repeated code (e.g., duplicate interfaces, process models) while ensuring scalability and maintainability across teams. Let's evaluate each option:
A . Create a Center of Excellence (CoE):
A Center of Excellence is an organizational structure or team focused on standardizing practices, training, and governance across projects. While beneficial for long-term consistency, it doesn't directly address the technical design of minimizing repeated code for processes and forms. It's a strategic initiative, not a design solution, and doesn't solve the immediate need for code reuse. Appian's documentation mentions CoEs for governance but not as a primary design approach, making this less relevant here.
B . Create a common objects application:
This is the best recommendation. In Appian, a "common objects application" (or shared application) is used to store reusable components like expression rules, interfaces, process models, constants, and data types (e.g., CDTs). For a large-scale acquisition application with multiple teams, centralizing shared objects (e.g., rule!CommonForm, pm!CommonProcess) ensures consistency, reduces duplication, and simplifies maintenance. Teams can reference these objects in their applications, adhering to Appian's design best practices for scalability. This approach minimizes repeated code while allowing team-specific customizations, aligning with Lead Developer standards for large projects.
C . Create a Scrum of Scrums sprint meeting for the team leads:
A Scrum of Scrums meeting is a coordination mechanism for Agile teams, focusing on aligning sprint goals and resolving cross-team dependencies. While useful for collaboration, it doesn't address the technical design of minimizing repeated code-it's a process, not a solution for code reuse. Appian's Agile methodologies support such meetings, but they don't directly reduce duplication in processes and forms, making this less applicable.
D . Create duplicate processes and forms as needed:
Duplicating processes and forms (e.g., copying interface!PurchaseForm for each team) leads to redundancy, increased maintenance effort, and potential inconsistencies (e.g., divergent logic). This contradicts the goal of minimizing repeated code and violates Appian's design principles for reusability and efficiency. Appian's documentation strongly discourages duplication, favoring shared objects instead, making this the least effective option.
Conclusion: Creating a common objects application (B) is the recommended design. It centralizes reusable processes, forms, and other components, minimizing code duplication across teams while ensuring consistency and scalability for the large-scale acquisition application. This leverages Appian's application architecture for shared resources, aligning with Lead Developer best practices for multi-team projects.
Reference:
Appian Documentation: "Designing Large-Scale Applications" (Common Application for Reusable Objects).
Appian Lead Developer Certification: Application Design Module (Minimizing Code Duplication).
Appian Best Practices: "Managing Multi-Team Development" (Shared Objects Strategy).
To build a large scale acquisition application for a prominent customer, you should design for multiple processes and forms, while minimizing repeated code. One way to do this is to create a common objects application, which is a shared application that contains reusable components, such as rules, constants, interfaces, integrations, or data types, that can be used by multiple applications. This way, you can avoid duplication and inconsistency of code, and make it easier to maintain and update your applications. You can also use the common objects application to define common standards and best practices for your application development teams, such as naming conventions, coding styles, or documentation guidelines. Verified Reference: [Appian Best Practices], [Appian Design Guidance]

質問 # 26
......

当社Xhs1991は多くの優秀な専門家や教授がいます。過去数年、これらの専門家と教授は、すべての顧客向けにACD301試験問題を設計するために最善を尽くしました。さらに重要なことは、最終的にACD301試験問題でACD301認定を取得すると、人生の楽しみと人間関係の改善、ストレスの軽減、全体的な生活の質の向上という大きなメリットが得られることです。そのため、ACD301試験に合格し、関連する認定を取得するために全力を尽くすことは非常に重要です。

ACD301模擬モード: https://www.xhs1991.com/ACD301.html

• ACD301日本語参考 💦 ACD301専門知識 ⚾ ACD301日本語認定 🤣 ⏩ www.japancert.com ⏪サイトで《 ACD301 》の最新問題が使えるACD301受験記対策
• Appian ACD301 Exam | ACD301専門知識訓練 - 無料デモのダウンロード ACD301模擬モード 🔝 「 www.goshiken.com 」サイトにて➽ ACD301 🢪問題集を無料で使おうACD301日本語認定
• ACD301専門知識 🚡 ACD301受験記対策 🏉 ACD301テスト難易度 🌑 今すぐ{ www.japancert.com }で▶ ACD301 ◀を検索して、無料でダウンロードしてくださいACD301テスト難易度
• ACD301試験の準備方法｜有難いACD301専門知識訓練試験｜高品質なAppian Lead Developer模擬モード 🕜 ✔ www.goshiken.com ️✔️で{ ACD301 }を検索して、無料でダウンロードしてくださいACD301資格認定試験
• ACD301復習問題集 🌤 ACD301試験復習 🍔 ACD301合格体験記 🔉 《 www.it-passports.com 》を開いて《 ACD301 》を検索し、試験資料を無料でダウンロードしてくださいACD301資格講座
• ACD301試験参考書、ACD301試験内容、ACD301問題集オンライン版 ✋ ウェブサイト《 www.goshiken.com 》を開き、➠ ACD301 🠰を検索して無料でダウンロードしてくださいACD301日本語認定
• 完璧-正確的なACD301専門知識訓練試験-試験の準備方法ACD301模擬モード 🧕 サイト☀ www.passtest.jp ️☀️で（ ACD301 ）問題集をダウンロードACD301資格講座
• Appian ACD301 Exam | ACD301専門知識訓練 - 無料デモのダウンロード ACD301模擬モード 💘 今すぐ☀ www.goshiken.com ️☀️で✔ ACD301 ️✔️を検索し、無料でダウンロードしてくださいACD301全真模擬試験
• 更新するACD301専門知識訓練 - 合格スムーズACD301模擬モード | 最高のACD301復習対策 🥜 URL 【 www.passtest.jp 】をコピーして開き、「 ACD301 」を検索して無料でダウンロードしてくださいACD301最新試験
• 更新するACD301専門知識訓練 - 合格スムーズACD301模擬モード | 最高のACD301復習対策 🌼 《 www.goshiken.com 》に移動し、➠ ACD301 🠰を検索して、無料でダウンロード可能な試験資料を探しますACD301資格試験
• ACD301合格体験記 🔈 ACD301問題無料 🤗 ACD301資格試験 📫 時間限定無料で使える⮆ ACD301 ⮄の試験問題は➥ www.passtest.jp 🡄サイトで検索ACD301試験復習
• ACD301 Exam Questions
• globaleducare.org lizellehartley.com.au mocktestchannel.com aidoushequ12.buzz www.1pingg.cc marketika.net oshaim.com learnyble.com www.jcdqzdh.com bbs.5a5u.com.cn